Once upon a time there was a boy named César Pompeyo who, when he misbehaved, received a couple of lashes on the chubby culete. This happened so often, because César behaved so badly, that one day his culete, tired of receiving everywhere, decided to leave, leaving the child without the anatomical part where the back loses its noble name, unable to sit down again. have breakfast, neither on the swings, nor on the horses and not even on your bike.
Then Caesar went to his mother and He told her she was a cruel mother, that he had treated him very badly, that he does not stick to who he loves, that he was a child and that, although it is true that he was behaving badly, he did it to ask for more attention, more love, more time together, since that his little brother was born, he noticed that nobody loved him.
Now watch the video that comes next in which the story is explained because ("find the seven differences") I invented half of the story.An independent culete it is, in fact, a perfect story to get children to normalize the violence of parents and to live with fear the possibility of suddenly losing a part of their body.
The true story: “An independent culete”
As you can see, César Pompeyo does not really say anything to his mother, he realizes that he does not want to live without an ass, and asks his culete to return home, that he will behave well. I don't know what the real problem is with this child. I do not know why he called attention in such a sharp way, but it could perfectly be what I have said in the second paragraph: the child feels that he needs dad and mom longer, the child feels loneliness, indifference and, when he asks , claims and draws attention for the bad (because we already know that when a child does not get things for the good, then he asks for the bad), get hosts in the ass (Yes, hosts, if they were loose cheeks the ass would not leave home).
We will agree then that César Pompeyo has a problem with his parents and that the parents have a problem with the child. Something fails, something has to be solved and there are some rough edges that must be filed. However, by guiding the story towards fear, towards the loss of the ass, the boy ends up behaving well for fear that his ass will disappear again, but the loneliness and lack of time and affection of his parents are still there. For the child nothing has been solved, everything remains the same.
What message does the story offer for children and parents?
Well, the threat that if he misbehaves dad and mom can hit him in the ass, because it is normal (if even in the books explained) and the re-threat that if he takes many, his ass can go to leave no possibility to sit down and enjoy the pleasures that a good ass provides us daily.
Fear gives me that many parents fix the problems with their children with a “I hit you, and if I hit you, you run out of an ass,” instead of being more empathetic and trying to understand the child. I fear because we are the adults and we are the ones who have to try to understand our children, who see the world in a very different way from ours and who are not able to express emotions or feelings like "I feel alone", "I feel an inner emptiness", " I notice that I am not important to you ”,“ I would like you to spend more time ”.
In summary, if I read this story to my children, after closing it I would say the following:
Surely you will be amazed by the cruelty of the mother, capable of hitting her son to the point that her ass leaves home, and surely you will be scared thinking that your ass could go while you sleep. Quiet, at home neither mom nor dad will ever hit you and calm, your ass will never disappear.
Cheap psychology, they call it, the one that files the tip of the iceberg so that people see a calm sea, but that leaves the rest below at the risk of colliding if you get too close or reappear, if the sea level drops.
