One of the most dangerous things a television reporter can do for a live program when he enters a school is to approach a child and ask him something about the school or, more specifically, how they are treated or what they do when they are They behave badly.
I say dangerous because children always tell the truth, or so they say, and when a few months ago a reporter entered a school and bent down to talk to a little girl, he was going to imagine his answer to the question: "What makes you the teacher when you do something wrong? "
The good man I suppose he expected the girl to say something like "he explains that we don't do that", "he talks to us so that we can behave better" or even a "punishes us", which he would surely have accepted without problems. However, the girl, neither short nor lazy, perhaps sincere, goes and lets go "They hit us".
Faced with this response, the reporter, in a voice that you are telling me, says "What do they do to you?" and the girl, determined, raises her head to look him in the eye and responds again "They hit us". The reporter, incredulous, denies his words "No, no, no ... How are you going to get hit, woman?"
He then decides not to give the girl another word and get up to listen to the teacher who says that they cut it, to which the reporter replies that "it is live", and she insists "you have not recorded that, right?" and he insists "it's live, Mercedes, don't worry, nothing happens."
Consequences that all Galicia sees a girl saying that when they misbehave they get hit? No idea, but of course saying "cut that" is not a very eloquent defense of the facts. Maybe it would have been better something like "this girl has a lot of imagination, what we do is ...", which could have been true or false, of course, like the girl's words, which can also be true or false.
What do your detective skills tell you, Holmes? Who lies in this case?
